Ketahanan Sosial Mahasiswa INSIP Pemalang dalam Menghadapi Disrupsi Digital: Perspektif Sosiologi Pendidikan Kontemporer
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.67755/jhusum.v1i1.175Keywords:
Ketahanan Sosial, Disrupsi Digital, Sosiologi PendidikanAbstract
Dalam perspektif sosiologi pendidikan, bahwa transformasi digital tidak hanya mengubah media pembelajaran saja, tetapi juga mentransformasikan struktur sosial di lingkungan kampus, sehingga mahasiswa dituntut untuk memiliki ketahanan sosial. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis bagaimana ketahanan sosial mahasiswa INSIP Pemalang terbentuk dalam menghadapi disrupsi digital berdasarkan perspektif sosiologi pendidikan kontemporer. Penelitian ini menggunakan pendekatan kualitatif dengan desain studi kasus (case study). Temuan penelitian memperlihatkan bahwa mahasiswa yang memiliki jejaring sosial yang baik, aktif dalam kegiatan akademik dan organisasi, serta mampu memanfaatkan teknologi secara bijaksana menunjukkan tingkat ketahanan sosial yang lebih tinggi. Penelitian ini menyimpulkan bahwa ketahanan sosial mahasiswa INSIP Pemalang dalam menghadapi disrupsi digital terbentuk melalui interaksi yang sinergis antara modal sosial, budaya akademik, literasi digital, dan nilai-nilai religius. Penelitian ini memberikan kontribusi teoretis dengan memperkaya kajian sosiologi pendidikan kontemporer melalui pengembangan pemahaman mengenai ketahanan sosial mahasiswa sebagai konstruksi sosial yang dipengaruhi oleh modal sosial, budaya akademik, literasi digital, dan nilai religius.
Downloads
References
Abdolrezapour, P., Jahanbakhsh Ganjeh, S., & Ghanbari, N. (2023). Self-efficacy and resilience as predictors of students’ academic motivation in online education. PLoS ONE, 18(5), Article e0285984. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0285984
Abdul-Rahman, M., Adegoriola, M. I., McWilson, W. K., Soyinka, O., & Adenle, Y. A. (2023). Novel use of social media big data and artificial intelligence for community resilience assessment (CRA) in university towns. Sustainability, 15(2), Article 1295. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15021295
Alfirević, N., Stanke, K. M., Santoboni, F., & Curcio, G. (2023). The roles of professional socialization and higher education context in prosocial and pro-environmental attitudes of social science and humanities versus business students in Italy and Croatia. Sustainability, 15(12), Article 9669. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15129669
Bedi, A. (2023). Keep learning: Student engagement in an online environment. Online Learning, 27(2). https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v27i2.3287
Berti, S., Grazia, V., & Molinari, L. (2023). Active student participation in whole-school interventions in secondary school. A systematic literature review. Educational Psychology Review, 35(2), Article 52. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-023-09773-x
Corboz, E., & Esposti, E. D. (2023). From the margins to the centre. Journal of Muslims in Europe, 12(1), 98–117. https://doi.org/10.1163/22117954-bja10053
Creswell, J. W. (2022). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches. Sage Publications.
de Carvalho, F. S., Pilatti, L. A., de Carvalho, H. A., & de Lima, I. A. (2023). Information and communication technology in Brazilian public schools: A sustainable legacy of the pandemic? Sustainability, 15(8), Article 6462. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15086462
Eastgate, L., Creed, P. A., Hood, M., & Bialocerkowski, A. (2023). It takes work: How university students manage role boundaries when the future is calling. Research in Higher Education, 64(7), 1071–1088. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11162-023-09736-9
Evenhouse, D., Lee, Y., Berger, E., Rhoads, J. F., & DeBoer, J. (2023). Engineering student experience and self-direction in implementations of blended learning: A cross-institutional analysis. International Journal of STEM Education, 10(1), Article 19. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-023-00406-x
García Sánchez, N. A. (2023). La experiencia del aprendizaje ubicuo en la educación. Dialéctica, 1(20). https://doi.org/10.56219/dialctica.v1i20.1646
Guo, S., Li, T., Xue, B., & Yang, X. (2023). Horticultural activities participation and college students’ positive mental characters: Mediating role of academic self-efficacy. Horticulturae, 9(3), Article 334. https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae9030334
Habibi, A., Sofyan, S., & Mukminin, A. (2023). Factors affecting digital technology access in vocational education. Scientific Reports, 13(1), Article 5682. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-32755-6
Harahap, S. M., & Hamka, H. (2023). Investigating the roles of philosophy, culture, language and Islam in Angkola’s local wisdom of ‘Dalihan Na Tolu’. HTS Teologiese Studies / Theological Studies, 79(1). https://doi.org/10.4102/hts.v79i1.8164
Hoda, N., Ahmad, N., Aldweesh, A., & Naveed, Q. N. (2023). Intensity of SNS use as a predictor of online social capital and the moderating role of SNS platforms: An empirical study using partial least squares structural equation modelling. Sustainability, 15(6), Article 4967. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15064967
Hutahaean, M., Eunike, I. J., & Silalahi, A. D. K. (2023). Do social media, good governance, and public trust increase citizens’ e-government participation? Dual approach of PLS-SEM and fsQCA. Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies, 2023, Article 9988602. https://doi.org/10.1155/2023/9988602
Ilyas, I., Rani, F. A., Bahri, S., & Sufyan, S. (2023). The accommodation of customary law to Islamic law: Distribution of inheritance in Aceh from a pluralism perspectives. Samarah: Jurnal Hukum Keluarga dan Hukum Islam, 7(2), Article 897. https://doi.org/10.22373/sjhk.v7i2.15650
Jara, H. X., Montesdeoca, L., & Tasseva, I. (2022). The role of automatic stabilizers and emergency tax–benefit policies during the COVID-19 pandemic: Evidence from Ecuador. European Journal of Development Research, 34(6), 2787–2809. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41287-021-00490-1
Ketut Swarjana, I. (2022). Populasi-sampel: Teknik sampling & bias dalam penelitian. Penerbit ANDI.
Kohn, V., Frank, M., & Holten, R. (2023). How sociotechnical realignment and sentiments concerning remote work are related – Insights from the COVID-19 pandemic. Business & Information Systems Engineering, 65(3), 259–276. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12599-023-00798-8
Lee, D. (2022). Public space in transition. transcript Verlag. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783839462324
Lin, Y., & Yu, Z. (2023). Extending Technology Acceptance Model to higher-education students’ use of digital academic reading tools on computers. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 20(1), Article 34. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-023-00403-8
Lowe, B. S., Jacobson, S. K., Israel, G. D., & Peterson, A. L. (2023). Association of religious end time beliefs with attitudes toward climate change and biodiversity loss. Sustainability, 15(11), Article 9071. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15119071
Lyz’, N. A., Istratova, O. N., & Golubeva, E. V. (2023). Working students: Educational success and subjective well-being. Higher Education in Russia, 32(2), 80–96. https://doi.org/10.31992/0869-3617-2023-32-2-80-96
Mecha, P., Martin-Romero, N., & Sanchez-Lopez, A. (2023). Associations between social support dimensions and resilience factors and pathways of influence in depression and anxiety rates in young adults. Spanish Journal of Psychology, 26, Article e11. https://doi.org/10.1017/SJP.2023.11
Morris-Eyton, H., & Pretorius, E. (2023). Cultivating a digital promise: Promoting reflective and reflexive activities to enhance self-directed learning for the 21st century. Student Success, 14(1), 88–99. https://doi.org/10.5204/ssj.2659
Suprayitno, Y. A. A., Ahmad, Tartila, & Sa’dianoor. (2024). Analisis data kualitatif. PT Sonpedia Publishing Indonesia.
Wo, J. C. (2023). Crime generators or social capital organizations? Examining the effects of places of worship on neighborhood crime. PLoS ONE, 18(3), Article e0282196. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0282196
Zakharin, M., & Bates, T. C. (2023). Relational models theory: Validation and replication for four fundamental relationships. PLoS ONE, 18(6), Article e0287391. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0287391
